This year's Bac Philosophy paper, pored over by the French media religiously every year had amongst its questions this "Est-ce qu'il est plus facile de connaître autrui que de se connaître soi-même?"
The expected (?) Cartesian response would run along the lines that one can doubt the existence of other minds in a way one cannot possibly doubt the existence of one's own. Thus, 'the' 'answer' would be "No". Nietzsche was right, though, Descartes was superficial. What kind of doubt would it take - a very doubtful doubt, yet a void opens up between l'autre and soi-même.
The unexamined life would answer - one knows them equally well.
What would a communist answer look like? The beginning might be that others know you better than you do yourself and you only know what little you know of yourself due to them.
mercredi 18 juin 2008
Inscription à :
Comment Feed (RSS)
|